Medisolv
See ModelIQ in Action Introduction
Readiness assessment

How to complete the assessment

This self-assessment helps you determine whether your organization can actively manage TEAM performance — or will only learn the outcome at reconciliation. It takes about 5 minutes across 6 sections. Rate each capability based on what is consistently available and used today. At the end, you'll get a personalized readiness score and a suggested starting point.

Yes · 2 pointsConsistently available and used
Partially · 1 pointAvailable with gaps, delays or manual effort
No · 0 pointsNot currently available

What you'll assess

1 Visibility & exposure
2 Performance drivers
3 Cross-functional alignment
4 Scenario modeling
5 Operating cadence
6 Ownership

Disclaimer: This assessment is intended for informational and planning purposes only. Results are based on your responses and do not represent an official CMS determination or guarantee of TEAM performance or financial results. Projections and modeled scenarios are directional and may change as additional CMS data, performance information, and program guidance become available.

Visibility and Drivers

1.Can we see our latest available performance and financial exposure?
Compare target and observed performance to date by episode category
Identify episode categories currently at financial risk
View historical and latest available performance trends
Project reconciliation position before final reconciliation
Give executives a concise view of exposure, drivers and available actions
Section score: 0 / 10
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.
2.Can we identify what drives episode variation?
Drill from aggregate performance into episode-level drivers
Compare performance across providers, procedures and service lines
Identify readmission and complication patterns
Analyze post-acute utilization, including SNF, home health and DME
Evaluate post-discharge follow-up and care-transition activity
Section score: 0 / 10
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.

Alignment and Action

3.Can finance, quality and operations see the same performance story?
Finance can see how quality performance affects estimated reconciliation
Quality can see the financial implications of quality-adjusted performance
Finance, quality and operations work from consistent data and assumptions
Quality performance is included in the recurring TEAM operating review
Section score: 0 / 8
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.
4.Can we model which actions can change the outcome?
Estimate net reconciliation using currently available performance data
Model changes in episode volume and spending
Test scenarios reflecting preliminary target prices, performance-year updates and key modeling assumptions
Model the potential effect of quality-adjustment performance
Compare a range of potential financial outcomes
Section score: 0 / 10
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.

Operating Discipline

5.Do we manage TEAM through a recurring operating cadence?
A recurring TEAM performance review is established
Finance, quality and operations participate
Episode drivers and post-acute utilization patterns are reviewed
Decisions, accountable owners and next steps are documented
Section score: 0 / 8
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.
6.Is ownership clear across finance, quality and operations?
An executive sponsor is accountable for TEAM performance
Financial ownership is defined
Quality ownership is defined
Operational and analytics ownership is defined
An escalation path exists when performance moves off target
Section score: 0 / 10
Some capabilities above are still blank — they won't count toward your score until answered.
Your result

Your TEAM Performance Readiness Score

Total score 0 / 56

This score reflects 0 of 28 capabilities answered so far. Unanswered capabilities are flagged with ★ within each section, and incomplete sections are flagged below — go back and finish them for your full, personalized result.

0–22 · Low Readiness

Limited visibility and operating discipline may leave financial exposure unidentified until opportunities to intervene have passed.

PRIORITY: Establish a shared baseline of latest available performance, projected reconciliation position and accountable ownership.

23–41 · Developing Readiness

Important capabilities exist, but gaps in data, analysis, cross-functional alignment or operating cadence may make it difficult to translate insight into timely action.

PRIORITY: Identify the weakest readiness dimensions and close the gaps that most directly limit intervention.

42–56 · Strong Readiness

Your organization has many of the capabilities required to manage TEAM proactively. The next opportunity is to make performance more predictive, scenario-driven and actionable across finance, quality and operations.

PRIORITY: Strengthen forecasting, scenario modeling and intervention tracking to improve confidence in the expected outcome.

Next step

See where TEAM performance stands — and what could change before reconciliation.

Schedule a 30-Minute Conversation →

Don't stop at the score

Your total score shows overall readiness. Your lowest-scoring section reveals the capability most likely to prevent your organization from improving the outcome before reconciliation.

SectionStart hereSee it in action in Medisolv ModelIQ
1 · we see our latest available performance and financial exposure Establish a current view of latest available performance and projected reconciliation position Executive Summary
2 · we identify what drives episode variation Identify the providers, utilization patterns and care transitions driving variation Episode / Provider / Procedure Drivers
3 · finance, quality and operations see the same performance story Create one shared performance view across finance, quality and operations Quality-to-Dollar Impact
4 · we model which actions can change the outcome Determine which changes could materially affect the expected outcome Scenario Modeling
5 · we manage TEAM through a recurring operating cadence Establish a recurring review tied to decisions, owners and next steps Monthly Operating Review
6 · ownership clear across finance, quality and operations Define executive, financial, quality and operational accountability Governance Charter
From assessment to action

Turn TEAM Data Into an Operating Advantage

Medisolv ModelIQ for TEAM transforms available TEAM performance data into a recurring operating view of episode performance and projected financial results. Finance, quality and operations can use it to:

See latest available performance and projected reconciliation position
Identify the drivers behind episode variation
Understand how quality affects the expected result
Model a range of potential outcomes
Focus attention on the actions that could still make a difference

Disclaimer: This assessment is intended for informational and planning purposes only. Results are based on your responses and do not represent an official CMS determination or guarantee of TEAM performance or financial results. Projections and modeled scenarios are directional and may change as additional CMS data, performance information, and program guidance become available.

Medisolv
6 sections · ~5 minutes